Honeybadger Solutions · Arizona
Security Guard Cost Estimator
Get a planning-level estimate in 20 seconds. For your written estimate, request a free assessment. Nothing is paid until you accept the estimate.
or Book a consultation online · veteran-owned & AZ-licensed
Planning estimates only, set above the full cost of a properly paid, insured and supervised officer. Many sites cost more. Your price depends on site risk, location, shift pattern, officer tier and requirements, and is quoted in writing after an assessment. Not a quote or contract.
What one properly paid officer-hour really costs
Every guard quote starts with the officer’s wage, and the wage decides whether the post gets covered. Phoenix’s largest security companies pay their best armed officers close to $30 an hour (Allied Universal up to $29.85, GardaWorld $29.93, Securitas $30.95; Indeed, September 2026), and the best-paid tenth of Phoenix-area guards earn more than $26.58 (BLS, May 2025). Across the market, posts stay reliably staffed at about $20 an hour for unarmed officers and $25 an hour for armed officers. Officers with law-enforcement or military backgrounds earn $25 to $40. Paying less leads to call-offs, no-shows and constant turnover.
Here is what one officer-hour costs an employer who follows the rules and pays at the top of the Phoenix market, before any office overhead or profit:
| Direct cost per officer-hour | Unarmed at $25 | Armed at $30 |
|---|---|---|
| Officer wage | $25.00 | $30.00 |
| Overtime and call-off relief allowance (about 10%) | $2.50 | $3.00 |
| Arizona earned paid sick time (40 hours a year) | $0.48 | $0.58 |
| Payroll taxes: Social Security and Medicare (7.65%), federal and Arizona unemployment | $2.24 | $2.67 |
| Workers’ compensation (class 7720, upper Arizona rate) | $0.51 | $0.61 |
| General liability and umbrella insurance (armed costs more) | $0.75 | $2.00 |
| Licensing, training, firearms qualification, uniforms, background checks | $0.50 | $1.00 |
| Health or benefit contribution | $1.50 | $1.50 |
| Field supervision, scheduling and dispatch | $1.50 | $1.50 |
| Direct cost before overhead and profit | about $34.97 | about $42.85 |
Office overhead, accounting, recruiting, vehicles, software and a sustainable margin all sit on top of that. So when a quote arrives near the direct cost of a properly paid officer, or below it, something has been cut. It is usually the wage, the hours, workers’ compensation (by paying guards as 1099 contractors), insurance, or the relief officer who covers a call-off.
Guards also need full weeks. An officer offered 16 to 24 hours takes a second job, and when the schedules clash the security shift is the one dropped. Providers that give officers 40 to 50 hours keep the same people on your post.
Sources and assumptions: BLS OEWS May 2025, Phoenix–Mesa–Chandler metro (Security Guards) (security guard wages); Indeed — Allied Universal armed officer pay, Phoenix (Sep 2026); Indeed — GardaWorld armed officer pay, Phoenix (Sep 2026); Indeed — Securitas officer pay, Phoenix (Sep 2026); Industrial Commission of Arizona (earned paid sick time); IRS (Social Security and Medicare 7.65%); Arizona DES (new-employer unemployment rate 2.0% on the first $8,000); Arizona class 7720 workers’ compensation rates ($0.91 to $1.81 per $100 of payroll, 2025). Insurance, training, benefit, supervision and relief lines are typical allowances, not quotes.
What actually drives the cost of security guard services in Arizona
The estimator above gives you a planning number. This section explains what sits behind it, because the single biggest cause of disappointment in this industry is a client comparing two quotes that look like the same service and are not.
Guard pricing is built from an hourly bill rate. That rate has to cover the officer’s wage, payroll taxes, workers’ compensation, general and professional liability insurance, licensing, uniform and equipment, supervision, scheduling and recruitment, and the company’s margin. When a bid comes in materially below the market, one of those line items has been cut. It is almost never the margin.
The variables that move the number most
Armed or unarmed. This is the largest single swing. An armed officer in Arizona carries additional state licensing, additional training, ongoing qualification, and a substantially higher insurance load for the company employing them. Expect a meaningful premium per hour over an unarmed post. The right question is not “which is cheaper” but “does the threat profile justify a firearm on site” — and for many retail, construction and residential applications, the honest answer is no.
Hours and coverage pattern. A single eight-hour shift costs more per hour than continuous coverage, because the provider still has to recruit, schedule and supervise the post. Twenty-four-hour coverage requires roughly 4.2 full-time officers once you account for shift rotation, holidays, sick cover and turnover — which is why round-the-clock coverage is priced differently from a simple multiplication of hours.
Site risk and post conditions. A quiet lobby and an active construction yard with documented theft history are not the same post, and they do not attract the same officers. Sites with a real incident history, isolated locations, overnight-only coverage, or a requirement to physically intervene will price higher because retention is harder.
Location. Metro Phoenix and Tucson have deeper labour pools than Casa Grande, Coolidge, Eloy or rural Pinal County. Remote sites often carry a travel or minimum-hours premium because the provider cannot fill the post from a nearby rotation.
Specialist requirements. Cannabis facilities, dispensary transport, firearms retail, healthcare, and anything with a compliance obligation carry higher rates because the officer requires specific training and the provider carries specific exposure.
What a legitimate Arizona quote includes
Before you compare numbers, confirm each of these is in the bill rate and not billed separately later:
- A state-licensed officer working under a licensed agency — in Arizona, both the individual and the agency are regulated by the Department of Public Safety
- General liability and, where relevant, professional liability cover, with your organisation named as an additional insured
- Workers’ compensation for the officer
- Uniform, equipment and communications
- Written post orders specific to your site, not a generic template
- Supervisory visits and a named account contact
- Documented incident reporting you actually receive
- Holiday and overtime treatment, stated clearly
Anything not on that list is an extra. Ask for it in writing.
The cheap-bid problem
When a bid arrives well under every other quote, there are only a few places that money can have come from, and all of them eventually become your problem.
The officer is being paid near minimum wage, which means the post is filled by whoever is available rather than whoever is suitable, and turnover is constant — so nobody on your site ever learns it. Insurance is thin or the certificate does not actually cover the work being performed, which becomes acute the moment an incident occurs. Supervision is nominal, so nobody verifies the officer is awake, present, or on site at all. Or the licensing is not what it appears to be, which in Arizona is both a compliance problem and a liability problem for the client as well as the provider.
The test is simple: ask for the agency licence number, ask for a current certificate of insurance naming your organisation, and ask how supervision is documented. A serious provider answers all three in a day.
Coverage models, and which one you probably need
Standing post. An officer stationed at a fixed point — lobby, gate, entrance. Highest deterrent value at that point, highest cost per hour of site coverage. Right when the risk is concentrated at a specific location.
Foot or vehicle patrol. An officer covering a defined route on a schedule. Better coverage of a large area per dollar, lower presence at any single point. Right for campuses, storage facilities, construction sites and large yards.
Mobile patrol with checkpoints. Scheduled visits across multiple sites rather than continuous presence. Far cheaper per site and genuinely effective as a deterrent against opportunistic activity, provided the schedule is randomised. Right for multiple properties, vacant buildings and out-of-hours coverage where continuous presence cannot be justified.
Event and temporary coverage. Short-duration staffing, usually with a minimum-hours commitment. Priced higher per hour because the provider is staffing a one-off.
Many sites are best served by a mix — a standing post at the entrance during business hours, mobile patrol overnight. Any provider who proposes the most expensive option for every scenario is selling, not advising.
Technology instead of, or alongside, officers
Cameras and access control do not replace a guard, and a guard does not replace cameras. They fail in opposite directions. A camera records what happened and cannot intervene; an officer can intervene but cannot be in two places. The cost-effective answer for most commercial sites is a layered one: technology for coverage and evidence, human presence where a decision has to be made in the moment.
Where budget is genuinely constrained, monitored technology with scheduled mobile patrol usually delivers more security per dollar than a single underpaid standing post. That is an uncomfortable recommendation for a guard company to make, which is precisely why it is worth hearing.
How to use the estimate above
The figure the estimator produces is a planning range, suitable for budgeting and for sanity-checking quotes you have already received. It is not a quote, because a real quote requires knowing the site, the risk, the hours and the compliance requirements. What it is good for is telling you whether a number you have been given sits inside the range the market actually supports — and if it sits well below, asking why.
If you want a real figure, a site assessment takes under an hour and costs nothing. We will tell you if you need fewer hours than you think, and we have told clients before now that they did not need a guard at all.
Common questions
Is there a minimum number of hours? Most providers, including us, have a minimum per visit or shift. Staffing a post for ninety minutes costs nearly as much to organise as staffing it for four hours.
Are armed guards more effective? They are more appropriate for specific threat profiles — cash handling, high-value inventory, documented violent incidents. For general deterrence and access control, a well-trained unarmed officer with clear post orders performs just as well at lower cost and lower liability.
Can we start small and scale? Yes, and it is usually the right approach. Start with the highest-risk window, measure what actually happens, and expand based on evidence rather than assumption.
What about outside Arizona? We operate statewide in Arizona directly and nationwide through a licensed partner network, with the same vetting and insurance standards applied to partner-delivered work.
Related reading
What this estimate does not account for
Every estimator simplifies, and it is only fair to say where this one does. It does not know your incident history, and a site with a documented pattern of theft or confrontation will price above the range because the post is harder to keep staffed. It does not know your access requirements — badge issuance, visitor management, key control and alarm response all add duties that change the officer profile you need. It does not account for compliance overlays: healthcare, cannabis, firearms retail, federal facilities and anything with an audit requirement all carry training and documentation obligations that sit on top of the base rate.
It also assumes a reasonable contract length. Very short engagements price higher per hour because recruitment and onboarding are amortised over fewer hours, and genuinely long-term commitments can price lower because retention improves and the provider is not constantly re-filling the post.
Finally, it assumes you want the job done properly. If your requirement is genuinely a warm body in a chair with no expectation of intervention, reporting or supervision, you can buy that for less than this estimator suggests — from someone else. We have declined that work before and will again, because a post with no standards attached is a liability wearing a uniform.