Digital Forensics & Cyber in All 50 States

Coverage · all 50 states · international

Honeybadger Solutions is headquartered in Casa Grande, Arizona. Digital forensics, cyber security, IT, eDiscovery, OSINT, background and financial investigations are performed remotely by our team in Arizona for clients in every state and abroad. Work that needs someone on the ground (surveillance, field investigation, process service, security officers) is done by our own officers in Arizona and through vetted, locally licensed partner agencies everywhere else.

How every service is delivered

Remote, nationwide & internationalDigital forensics, cyber security, managed IT, eDiscovery, OSINT, background checks, financial and asset investigations, skip tracing. Performed by our Arizona team; devices come to our lab by mail-in kit or are collected remotely.

Arizona in-houseEvery service, including security officers, patrol, field investigation and surveillance, process service, executive protection, bug sweeps (TSCM), drone operations and training, under our Arizona DPS agency licenses.

Outside Arizona: licensed partnersOn-the-ground work is coordinated by our team and carried out by vetted agencies licensed in that state. Executive protection is available nationwide this way. Bug sweeps are done by our Arizona team, which travels on request.

Digital forensics we deliver anywhere in the U.S.

Every service below is run by our Arizona lab with a documented chain of custody and a court-ready report. The tag shows how the evidence reaches us.

Mobile & tablet forensics
Mail-in or remote extraction

Texts, call logs, chats, photos and location data from phones and tablets.

Computer & hard drive forensics
Mail-in or remote imaging

Forensic images and analysis of laptops, desktops and drives.

Cloud account extraction
Fully remote

iCloud, Google, Microsoft 365 and other accounts collected with consent or legal authority.

Remote forensic extraction
Fully remote

We collect from your device over a guided, recorded session; the device stays with you.

Rapid field triage & on-site collection
Arizona on site; elsewhere by arrangement

On-site imaging and triage when devices can’t leave the premises.

Server, cloud & database forensics
Remote

Servers, file shares, tenants and databases preserved and examined.

Social media & website preservation
Fully remote

Posts, profiles and web pages captured with hashes and timestamps.

Deleted data recovery
Mail-in or remote

Recovery of deleted messages, files and media where the data still exists.

Spyware & stalkerware detection
Mail-in or remote

Checks phones and computers for monitoring apps and unwanted access.

Photo, video & metadata forensics
Remote

Authenticity, edits, timestamps and location data in images and video.

Email forensics & BEC
Fully remote

Business email compromise, spoofing and mailbox-rule investigations.

IP theft & departing employees
Remote or mail-in

What a departing employee copied, sent or deleted, and when.

Encrypted & locked devices
Mail-in

Assessment of locked, encrypted or damaged devices.

Blockchain & crypto tracing
Fully remote

Tracing cryptocurrency movements for fraud and asset matters.

eDiscovery & litigation support
Remote

Collection, processing and production for litigation.

Legal hold & data mapping
Remote

Find and preserve the data a case will need.

Document review & hosting
Remote

Secure hosting and review of collected documents.

Expert witness & testimony
Remote prep; travel for testimony

Reports, declarations and testimony support.

How remote and mail-in collection works · All digital forensics services

On-the-ground services

Service	Arizona	Other states
Armed & unarmed security officers	Arizona in-house	Licensed partner agencies
Mobile patrol, alarm response & fire watch	Arizona in-house	Licensed partner agencies
Private investigations in the field & surveillance	Arizona in-house	Licensed partner agencies
Process serving	Arizona in-house	Licensed partner agencies
Executive protection	Arizona in-house	Nationwide through licensed partner agencies
Bug sweeps (TSCM)	Arizona in-house	Our Arizona team travels on request

For attorneys and law firms

Most of our forensic work comes through counsel. Arizona firms get the full service in-house: collection at your office, the client’s home or a business, lab examination, a court-ready report and testimony, with our Arizona DPS private investigations agency license (#1759795) behind the work. Outside Arizona the same lab work is done remotely or on devices shipped to our Arizona lab.

Arizona: full serviceOn-site and remote collection, examination, reporting, declarations and testimony in state and federal court in Arizona. Criminal defense, family law, employment and civil litigation.

Every other state: remote or mail-inThe client ships the device to our Arizona lab in a mail-in kit, or we collect phones, computers and cloud accounts remotely in a guided session. The examination is done in Arizona under our Arizona license, with chain of custody and a report written for your state’s expert-evidence standard.

On-site collection outside ArizonaWe do not send examiners out of state. If a device cannot be shipped or collected remotely, we coordinate a licensed local examiner for the collection step and do the analysis in Arizona.

Typical matters: phone and computer examinations, deleted-data recovery, cloud and social-media preservation, email and document metadata, timeline and location analysis, review of the other side’s forensic report, and eDiscovery support. Book a confidential case review.

Coverage by state

Each state below shows how we deliver there, plus the rules that most often shape a forensic or cyber matter in that state: breach-notice deadlines, recording consent, the expert-evidence standard and the federal courts. Summaries are for orientation, with sources, and are not legal advice.

ArizonaHeadquarters · every service in-house

Everything	Home base. Every service is delivered by our own team under Arizona DPS agency licenses 1759798 (security guard) and 1759795 (private investigations).
Response	Same-day and rush response across Pinal County and the Phoenix and Tucson metros; statewide by arrangement.
Data-breach notice	Within 45 days of determining a breach; the Attorney General and others are notified when more than 1,000 Arizonans are affected. A.R.S. § 18-552
Recording calls	One-party consent. A.R.S. § 13-3005
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. Ariz. R. Evid. 702
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.

AlabamaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. Sources indicate Alabama does not require an investigator license for digital examiners.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Alabama-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Alabama Private Investigation Board (APIB)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	As expeditiously as possible and without unreasonable delay, and within 45 days of determining a breach occurred that is reasonably likely to cause substantial harm. Regulator: Alabama Attorney General within 45 days if more than 1,000 Alabama residents must be notified. Ala. Code § 8-38-1 et seq. (notice: §§ 8-38-5, 8-38-6)
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Ala. Code § 13A-11-30
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. Ala. R. Evid. 702(b); Ala. Code § 12-21-160
Consumer privacy law	Alabama Personal Data Protection Act (HB 351), effective May 1, 2027.
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Middle and Southern Districts of Alabama.

Sources: law.justia.com · justia.com · apib.alabama.gov · mwl-law.com · hunton.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

AlaskaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. Sources indicate Alaska does not require an investigator license for digital examiners.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Alaska-licensed partner agencies (no statewide investigator license; we confirm local requirements).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	In the most expeditious time possible and without unreasonable delay (no fixed day limit). Regulator: No general AG notice; written notice to the Alaska Attorney General required if the entity determines no reasonable likelihood of harm; CRAs notified if more than 1,000 residents. Alaska Stat. § 45.48.010 et seq.
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Alaska Stat. § 42.20.310
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. Alaska R. Evid. 702; State v. Coon, 974 P.2d 386 (Alaska 1999)
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska.

Sources: dwt.com · justia.com · commons.erau.edu · mwl-law.com · assets.contentstack.io. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

ArkansasRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. Arkansas treats some forensic examination as licensed investigative work (Arkansas State Police (private investigators and private security agencies licensing)), so we do not send examiners into Arkansas; if your matter needs a device collected on site there, we coordinate a Arkansas-licensed examiner for that step.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Arkansas-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Arkansas State Police (private investigators and private security agencies licensing)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	In the most expedient time and manner possible and without unreasonable delay (no fixed day limit). Regulator: Arkansas Attorney General if more than 1,000 individuals affected, at the time individuals are notified or within 45 days of determining likelihood of harm, whichever is first. Ark. Code Ann. § 4-110-101 et seq. (notice: § 4-110-105)
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Ark. Code Ann. § 5-60-120
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. Ark. R. Evid. 702; Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Foote, 341 Ark. 105, 14 S.W.3d 512 (2000)
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas.

Sources: law.justia.com · justia.com · dps.arkansas.gov · mwl-law.com · assets.contentstack.io. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

CaliforniaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. California treats some forensic examination as licensed investigative work (Bureau of Security and Investigative Services (BSIS), Department of Consumer Affairs), so we do not send examiners into California; if your matter needs a device collected on site there, we coordinate a California-licensed examiner for that step.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted California-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Bureau of Security and Investigative Services (BSIS), Department of Consumer Affairs).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Within 30 calendar days of discovery of the breach (effective January 1, 2026). Regulator: California Attorney General within 15 calendar days after notifying individuals if more than 500 California residents affected (sample notice submitted). Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.82 (as amended by SB 446, eff. 2026-01-01)
Recording calls	All-party consent: everyone in a private conversation generally must agree before it is recorded. Cal. Penal Code §§ 632, 637.2
Expert evidence	Frye general-acceptance standard. People v. Kelly, 17 Cal. 3d 24 (1976) (Kelly/Frye); People v. Leahy, 8 Cal. 4th 587 (1994); Cal. Evid. Code §§ 801-802
Consumer privacy law	California Consumer Privacy Act (as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act), effective January 1, 2020.
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Eastern, Central and Southern Districts of California.

Sources: dataprotectionreport.com · justia.com · bsis.ca.gov · expertinstitute.com · osano.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

ColoradoRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. Sources indicate Colorado does not require an investigator license for digital examiners.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Colorado-licensed partner agencies (no statewide investigator license; we confirm local requirements).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	In the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, but not later than 30 days after determining a breach occurred. Regulator: Colorado Attorney General within 30 days if 500 or more Colorado residents reasonably believed affected. Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-716
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 18-9-303, 18-9-304
Expert evidence	A reliability test modeled on Daubert. CRE 702; People v. Shreck, 22 P.3d 68 (Colo. 2001)
Consumer privacy law	Colorado Privacy Act, effective July 1, 2023.
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado.

Sources: law.justia.com · justia.com · pinow.com · mwl-law.com · osano.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

ConnecticutRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. Sources indicate Connecticut does not require an investigator license for digital examiners.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Connecticut-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection (DESPP), Special Licensing & Firearms Unit).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery of the breach. Regulator: Connecticut Attorney General no later than when residents are notified (any number of residents). Conn. Gen. Stat. § 36a-701b
Recording calls	Mixed: the rule depends on the situation (for example in person versus by phone). Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 53a-187, 53a-189 (criminal); § 52-570d (civil)
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. Conn. Code Evid. § 7-2; State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 698 A.2d 739 (1997)
Consumer privacy law	Connecticut Data Privacy Act, effective July 1, 2023.
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut.

Sources: portal.ct.gov · justia.com · portal.ct.gov · mwl-law.com · osano.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

DelawareRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. Sources indicate Delaware does not require an investigator license for digital examiners.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Delaware-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Delaware State Police, Professional Licensing Section (Board of Examiners)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Without unreasonable delay but not later than 60 days after determination of the breach. Regulator: Delaware Attorney General, no later than notice to residents, if more than 500 Delaware residents affected. Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, § 12B-101 et seq. (notice: § 12B-102)
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, § 2402 (see also § 1335)
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. D.R.E. 702; M.G. Bancorporation, Inc. v. Le Beau, 737 A.2d 513 (Del. 1999)
Consumer privacy law	Delaware Personal Data Privacy Act, effective January 1, 2025.
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.

Sources: law.justia.com · justia.com · codes.findlaw.com · mwl-law.com · osano.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

District of ColumbiaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. District of Columbia treats some forensic examination as licensed investigative work (Department of Licensing and Consumer Protection (DLCP), Occupational and Professional Licensing Security Program), so we do not send examiners into District of Columbia; if your matter needs a device collected on site there, we coordinate a District of Columbia-licensed examiner for that step.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted District of Columbia-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Department of Licensing and Consumer Protection (DLCP), Occupational and Professional Licensing Security Program).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	In the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay (no fixed day limit). Regulator: D.C. Attorney General if 50 or more District residents affected, without unreasonable delay and no later than notice to residents. D.C. Code § 28-3851 et seq. (notice: § 28-3852)
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. D.C. Code § 23-542
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. Motorola Inc. v. Murray, 147 A.3d 751 (D.C. 2016) (en banc), adopting FRE 702
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

Sources: code.dccouncil.gov · justia.com · dlcp.dc.gov · expertinstitute.com · assets.contentstack.io. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

FloridaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. Florida treats some forensic examination as licensed investigative work (Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Licensing (Ch. 493, Fla. Stat.)), so we do not send examiners into Florida; if your matter needs a device collected on site there, we coordinate a Florida-licensed examiner for that step. A member of our team is based in Florida for scheduling and coordination.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Florida-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Licensing (Ch. 493, Fla. Stat.)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	As expeditiously as practicable and without unreasonable delay, no later than 30 days after determination of a breach (15-day extension for good cause). Regulator: Florida Department of Legal Affairs (Attorney General) within 30 days if 500 or more Floridians affected. Fla. Stat. § 501.171
Recording calls	All-party consent: everyone in a private conversation generally must agree before it is recorded. Fla. Stat. §§ 934.03, 934.10
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. Fla. Stat. § 90.702; In re Amendments to Fla. Evidence Code, 278 So. 3d 551 (Fla. 2019)
Consumer privacy law	Florida Digital Bill of Rights (narrow scope), effective July 1, 2024.
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Middle and Southern Districts of Florida.

Sources: leg.state.fl.us · justia.com · licensing.fdacs.gov · mwl-law.com · fpf.org. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

GeorgiaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. Georgia treats some forensic examination as licensed investigative work (Georgia Board of Private Detective and Security Agencies (Secretary of State)), so we do not send examiners into Georgia; if your matter needs a device collected on site there, we coordinate a Georgia-licensed examiner for that step.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Georgia-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Georgia Board of Private Detective and Security Agencies (Secretary of State)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay. Regulator: No Attorney General or regulator notice required; notify nationwide consumer reporting agencies if more than 10,000 Georgia residents are notified at one time. O.C.G.A. § 10-1-912
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. O.C.G.A. §§ 16-11-62, 16-11-66
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. O.C.G.A. § 24-7-702 (applies in all proceedings, including criminal, since the 2022 amendment)
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Middle and Southern Districts of Georgia.

Sources: law.justia.com · dmlp.org · sos.ga.gov · law.justia.com · myreptracker.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

HawaiiRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Hawaii rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Hawaii-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Hawaii Board of Private Detectives and Guards (DCCA Professional and Vocational Licensing Division)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Without unreasonable delay, consistent with the legitimate needs of law enforcement. Regulator: Hawaii Office of Consumer Protection (DCCA) and nationwide consumer reporting agencies, without unreasonable delay, if more than 1,000 persons are notified at one time. Haw. Rev. Stat. § 487N-2
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Haw. Rev. Stat. § 803-42
Expert evidence	A reliability test modeled on Daubert. Haw. R. Evid. 702; State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw. 130 (1992); State v. Vliet, 19 P.3d 42 (Haw. 2001)
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii.

Sources: law.justia.com · rcfp.org · files.hawaii.gov · ncji.org · enzuzo.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

IdahoRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Idaho rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Idaho-licensed partner agencies (no statewide investigator license; we confirm local requirements).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay. Regulator: No AG notice for private entities; state agencies must notify the Idaho Attorney General within 24 hours of discovering a breach. Idaho Code § 28-51-105
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Idaho Code § 18-6702
Expert evidence	A reliability test modeled on Daubert. Idaho R. Evid. 702; State v. Merwin, 962 P.2d 1026 (Idaho 1998); Weeks v. Eastern Idaho Health Services, 153 P.3d 1180 (Idaho 2007)
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho.

Sources: legislature.idaho.gov · rcfp.org · einvestigator.com · mwl-law.com · enzuzo.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

IllinoisRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Illinois rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Illinois-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (IDFPR), under 225 ILCS 447).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay. Regulator: Illinois Attorney General if more than 500 Illinois residents are affected, no later than when residents are notified. 815 ILCS 530/10 (Personal Information Protection Act)
Recording calls	All-party consent: everyone in a private conversation generally must agree before it is recorded. 720 ILCS 5/14-2(a)
Expert evidence	Frye general-acceptance standard. Ill. R. Evid. 702; In re Detention of New, 21 N.E.3d 406 (Ill. 2014)
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Central and Southern Districts of Illinois.

Sources: dwt.com · rcfp.org · kroll.com · homesteadexperts.com · enzuzo.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

IndianaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Indiana rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Indiana-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Indiana Professional Licensing Agency, Private Investigator and Security Guard Licensing Board).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Without unreasonable delay, but not more than 45 days after discovery of the breach. Regulator: Indiana Attorney General whenever resident notice is required (no numeric threshold); nationwide consumer reporting agencies if more than 1,000 consumers notified. Ind. Code §§ 24-4.9-3-1, 24-4.9-3-3
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Ind. Code §§ 35-31.5-2-176, 35-33.5-5-5
Expert evidence	A reliability test modeled on Daubert. Ind. Evid. R. 702(b); Malinski v. State, 794 N.E.2d 1071 (Ind. 2003)
Consumer privacy law	Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act, effective January 1, 2026.
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of Indiana.

Sources: law.justia.com · dmlp.org · in.gov · ncji.org · koleyjessen.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

IowaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Iowa rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Iowa-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Iowa Department of Public Safety, Program Services Bureau (Administrative Services Division)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Most expeditious manner possible and without unreasonable delay. Regulator: Director of the Iowa Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division within 5 business days after notifying consumers, if more than 500 Iowa residents are notified. Iowa Code § 715C.2
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Iowa Code §§ 808B.2, 727.8
Expert evidence	A reliability test modeled on Daubert. Iowa R. Evid. 5.702; Leaf v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 590 N.W.2d 525 (Iowa 1999); Ranes v. Adams Labs., 778 N.W.2d 677 (Iowa 2010)
Consumer privacy law	Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act (Iowa Code ch. 715D), effective January 1, 2025.
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of Iowa.

Sources: iowaattorneygeneral.gov · rcfp.org · dps.iowa.gov · homesteadexperts.com · legis.iowa.gov. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

KansasRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Kansas rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Kansas-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Kansas Attorney General (Private Detective Licensing), under K.S.A. 75-7b01 et seq).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay. Regulator: No Attorney General notice required; notify nationwide consumer reporting agencies if more than 1,000 consumers are notified at one time. K.S.A. 50-7a02
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(4)
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. K.S.A. 60-456(b) (Daubert adopted by statute effective July 1, 2014)
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas.

Sources: law.justia.com · rcfp.org · ksrevisor.gov · ksrevisor.gov · enzuzo.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

KentuckyRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Kentucky rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Kentucky-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Kentucky Board of Licensure for Private Investigators (KRS Chapter 329A)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay. Regulator: No Attorney General notice required; notify nationwide consumer reporting agencies if more than 1,000 persons are notified at one time. KRS 365.732
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. KRS 526.010, 526.020
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. KRE 702; Mitchell v. Commonwealth, 908 S.W.2d 100 (Ky. 1995); Toyota Motor Corp. v. Gregory, 136 S.W.3d 35 (Ky. 2004)
Consumer privacy law	Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act, effective January 1, 2026.
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Kentucky.

Sources: law.justia.com · rcfp.org · kpi.ky.gov · ncji.org · koleyjessen.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

LouisianaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Louisiana rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Louisiana-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Louisiana State Board of Private Investigator Examiners).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, but not later than 60 days from discovery of the breach. Regulator: Louisiana Attorney General: written notice within 10 days of notifying residents, including names of affected Louisiana residents (no numeric threshold); written reasons to AG if notice is delayed. La. R.S. 51:3074; La. Admin. Code tit. 16, pt. III, § 701
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. La. R.S. 15:1303
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. La. C.E. art. 702; State v. Foret, 628 So. 2d 1116 (La. 1993)
Consumer privacy law	Louisiana Data Privacy Act (SB 386, signed May 29, 2026), effective January 1, 2027.
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Eastern, Middle and Western Districts of Louisiana.

Sources: ashurstperkinscoie.com · rcfp.org · lsbpie.com · ncji.org · insideprivacy.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

MaineRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. Maine treats some forensic examination as licensed investigative work (Maine State Police, Special Investigations Unit (Department of Public Safety)), so we do not send examiners into Maine; if your matter needs a device collected on site there, we coordinate a Maine-licensed examiner for that step.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Maine-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Maine State Police, Special Investigations Unit (Department of Public Safety)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	No more than 30 days after becoming aware of the breach (may be delayed for law enforcement). Regulator: Maine Attorney General (or the Department of Professional and Financial Regulation for entities it regulates) whenever resident notice is required; consumer reporting agencies if more than 1,000 persons notified. 10 M.R.S. § 1348
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. 15 M.R.S. §§ 709, 710
Expert evidence	A reliability test modeled on Daubert. Me. R. Evid. 702; State v. Williams, 388 A.2d 500 (Me. 1978); Searles v. Fleetwood Homes of Pa., Inc., 878 A.2d 509 (Me. 2005)
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Maine.

Sources: legislature.maine.gov · rcfp.org · legislature.maine.gov · mwl-law.com · centralmaine.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

MarylandRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Maryland rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Maryland-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Maryland Department of State Police, Licensing Division (Maryland Private Detectives Act, Bus. Occ. & Prof. Title 13)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	As soon as reasonably practicable, but not later than 45 days after the business discovers or is notified of the breach. Regulator: Maryland Office of the Attorney General must be notified before notice is given to affected individuals; no minimum resident threshold. Md. Code Ann., Com. Law § 14-3504
Recording calls	All-party consent: everyone in a private conversation generally must agree before it is recorded. Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-402
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. Md. Rule 5-702; Rochkind v. Stevenson, 236 A.3d 630 (Md. 2020)
Consumer privacy law	Maryland Online Data Privacy Act, effective October 1, 2025.
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.

Sources: mgaleg.maryland.gov · justia.com · mdsp.maryland.gov · mwl-law.com · oag.maryland.gov. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

MassachusettsRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Massachusetts rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Massachusetts-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Massachusetts State Police, Certification Unit (private detective licenses issued by the Colonel of the State Police)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	As soon as practicable and without unreasonable delay; no fixed number of days (notices may go out on a rolling basis). Regulator: Massachusetts Attorney General and the Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation (OCABR) for any breach affecting a Massachusetts resident; no minimum threshold. Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93H, § 3
Recording calls	All-party consent: everyone in a private conversation generally must agree before it is recorded. Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 99
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. Commonwealth v. Lanigan, 641 N.E.2d 1342 (Mass. 1994) (Daubert-Lanigan)
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

Sources: mass.gov · justia.com · mass.gov · mwl-law.com · aimnet.org. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

MichiganRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. Michigan treats some forensic examination as licensed investigative work (Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA), Corporations, Securities & Commercial Licensing Bureau), so we do not send examiners into Michigan; if your matter needs a device collected on site there, we coordinate a Michigan-licensed examiner for that step.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Michigan-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA), Corporations, Securities & Commercial Licensing Bureau).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Without unreasonable delay (no fixed number of days), subject to scope determination and law-enforcement delay. Regulator: No state regulator or Attorney General notice required; nationwide consumer reporting agencies must be notified if more than 1,000 Michigan residents are notified. Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.72
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.539c
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. Mich. R. Evid. 702
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Michigan.

Sources: legislature.mi.gov · dmlp.org · legislature.mi.gov · mwl-law.com · privacyterms.io. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

MinnesotaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Minnesota rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Minnesota-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Minnesota Board of Private Detective and Protective Agent Services (Department of Public Safety)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	In the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay. Regulator: No Attorney General notice required under § 325E.61; all consumer reporting agencies within 48 hours if more than 500 persons are notified at one time. Minn. Stat. § 325E.61
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Minn. Stat. § 626A.02
Expert evidence	Frye general-acceptance standard. Minn. R. Evid. 702; State v. Mack, 292 N.W.2d 764 (Minn. 1980); Goeb v. Tharaldson, 615 N.W.2d 800 (Minn. 2000) (Frye-Mack)
Consumer privacy law	Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act, effective July 31, 2025.
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Sources: revisor.mn.gov · justia.com · dps.mn.gov · madgettlaw.com · ag.state.mn.us. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

MississippiRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Mississippi rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Mississippi-licensed partner agencies (no statewide investigator license; we confirm local requirements).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Without unreasonable delay, subject to law-enforcement needs and completion of an investigation into the nature and scope of the incident. Regulator: No Attorney General or regulator notice required (AG enforces violations as unfair trade practices). Miss. Code Ann. § 75-24-29
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-531
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. Miss. R. Evid. 702; Miss. Transp. Comm'n v. McLemore, 863 So. 2d 31 (Miss. 2003)
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of Mississippi.

Sources: law.justia.com · justia.com · mpia.org · mwl-law.com · billtrack50.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

MissouriRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Missouri rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Missouri-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Missouri Board of Private Investigator and Private Fire Investigator Examiners (Division of Professional Registration)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Without unreasonable delay, consistent with law-enforcement needs and measures to determine the scope of the breach. Regulator: Attorney General's office and nationwide consumer reporting agencies, without unreasonable delay, if more than 1,000 consumers are notified at one time. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 407.1500
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 542.402
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 490.065 (as amended by HB 153, 2017)
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Missouri.

Sources: revisor.mo.gov · dmlp.org · revisor.mo.gov · natlawreview.com · practiceguides.chambers.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

MontanaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Montana rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Montana-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Montana Department of Labor & Industry, Private Security Program).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Without unreasonable delay, consistent with law-enforcement needs. Regulator: Electronic copy of the notice submitted simultaneously to the Attorney General's Office of Consumer Protection, with date/method of distribution and number notified; no minimum threshold. Mont. Code Ann. § 30-14-1704
Recording calls	All-party consent: everyone in a private conversation generally must agree before it is recorded. Mont. Code Ann. § 45-8-213
Expert evidence	A reliability test modeled on Daubert. Mont. R. Evid. 702; State v. Moore (1994); State v. Cline (1996)
Consumer privacy law	Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act, effective October 1, 2024.
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Montana.

Sources: law.justia.com · justia.com · boards.bsd.dli.mt.gov · scholarworks.umt.edu · fpf.org. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

NebraskaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Nebraska rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Nebraska-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Nebraska Secretary of State (private detective and plain clothes investigator licensing)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	As soon as possible and without unreasonable delay, consistent with law-enforcement needs. Regulator: Nebraska Attorney General no later than the time notice is provided to Nebraska residents; no minimum threshold. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 87-803
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 86-290
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. Schafersman v. Agland Coop, 631 N.W.2d 862 (Neb. 2001)
Consumer privacy law	Nebraska Data Privacy Act, effective January 1, 2025.
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Sources: nebraskalegislature.gov · justia.com · nebraskalegislature.gov · mwl-law.com · hunton.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

NevadaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Nevada rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Nevada-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Nevada Private Investigators Licensing Board).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	In the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, consistent with law-enforcement needs. Regulator: No Attorney General or regulator notice required; consumer reporting agencies without unreasonable delay if more than 1,000 persons are notified at one time. Nev. Rev. Stat. § 603A.220
Recording calls	Mixed: the rule depends on the situation (for example in person versus by phone). Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 200.620, 200.650
Expert evidence	The state’s own reliability test. NRS 50.275; Hallmark v. Eldridge (2008); Higgs v. State, 222 P.3d 648 (Nev. 2010)
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada.

Sources: leg.state.nv.us · justia.com · leg.state.nv.us · vegaslegalmagazine.com · privacyterms.io. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

New HampshireRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm New Hampshire rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted New Hampshire-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by New Hampshire Department of Safety, Division of State Police, Permits and Licensing Unit (RSA 106-F)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	As quickly as possible after determining misuse has occurred or is reasonably likely to occur. Regulator: New Hampshire Attorney General's office (or primary regulator for regulated entities), stating anticipated notice date and approximate number of NH residents; no minimum threshold. N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 359-C:20
Recording calls	All-party consent: everyone in a private conversation generally must agree before it is recorded. N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 570-A:2
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. N.H. R. Evid. 702; Baker Valley Lumber, Inc. v. Ingersoll-Rand Co., 813 A.2d 409 (N.H. 2002)
Consumer privacy law	New Hampshire Data Privacy Act (RSA 507-H), effective January 1, 2025.
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire.

Sources: law.justia.com · justia.com · nhsp.dos.nh.gov · mwl-law.com · doj.nh.gov. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

New JerseyRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm New Jersey rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted New Jersey-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by New Jersey State Police, Private Detective Unit).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	In the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay. Regulator: Must report the breach to the New Jersey Division of State Police before notifying affected customers (no numeric threshold). N.J. Stat. Ann. §§ 56:8-161 to -163
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. N.J. Stat. Ann. § 2A:156A-4
Expert evidence	A reliability test modeled on Daubert. N.J.R.E. 702; In re Accutane Litigation (2018) (civil); State v. Olenowski (2023) (criminal)
Consumer privacy law	New Jersey Data Privacy Act (N.J.S.A. 56:8-166.4 et seq.), effective January 15, 2025.
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

Sources: law.onecle.com · justia.com · nj.gov · americanbar.org · mofo.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

New MexicoRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm New Mexico rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted New Mexico-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by New Mexico Regulation and Licensing Department, Private Investigations Advisory Board).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	In the most expedient time possible, but not later than 45 days following discovery of the breach. Regulator: New Mexico Attorney General within 45 days if more than 1,000 New Mexico residents are notified. N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 57-12C-1 to 57-12C-12 (Data Breach Notification Act)
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. N.M. Stat. Ann. § 30-12-1
Expert evidence	A reliability test modeled on Daubert. N.M. R. Evid. 11-702; State v. Alberico, 116 N.M. 156, 861 P.2d 192 (1993)
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico.

Sources: constangy.com · justia.com · rld.nm.gov · expertinstitute.com · mayerbrown.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

New YorkRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm New York rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted New York-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by New York Department of State, Division of Licensing Services).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	In the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, but not later than 30 days after discovery of the breach. Regulator: New York Attorney General, Department of State and Division of State Police whenever NY residents are notified; also NYDFS for DFS-covered entities. N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 899-aa
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. N.Y. Penal Law §§ 250.00, 250.05
Expert evidence	Frye general-acceptance standard. People v. Wesley, 83 N.Y.2d 417 (1994); Parker v. Mobil Oil Corp., 7 N.Y.3d 434 (2006)
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Southern, Eastern and Western Districts of New York.

Sources: constangy.com · justia.com · dos.ny.gov · brandonjbroderick.com · mayerbrown.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

North CarolinaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. North Carolina treats some forensic examination as licensed investigative work (North Carolina Private Protective Services Board), so we do not send examiners into North Carolina; if your matter needs a device collected on site there, we coordinate a North Carolina-licensed examiner for that step.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted North Carolina-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by North Carolina Private Protective Services Board).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Without unreasonable delay, in the most expedient time possible consistent with measures needed to determine the scope of the breach. Regulator: Consumer Protection Division of the NC Attorney General's Office whenever any NC resident is notified (no threshold); consumer reporting agencies if more than 1,000 persons. N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 75-61, 75-65
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-287
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. N.C. R. Evid. 702(a) (amended 2011); State v. McGrady, 368 N.C. 880 (2016)
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Eastern, Middle and Western Districts of North Carolina.

Sources: ncleg.gov · justia.com · ncdps.gov · nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu · mayerbrown.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

North DakotaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm North Dakota rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted North Dakota-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by North Dakota Private Investigative and Security Board).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	In the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay. Regulator: North Dakota Attorney General if more than 250 North Dakota residents are affected. N.D. Cent. Code ch. 51-30 (§ 51-30-01 et seq.)
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. N.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-15-02
Expert evidence	The state’s own reliability test. N.D. R. Ev. 702; State v. Hernandez, 707 N.W.2d 449 (N.D. 2005)
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota.

Sources: constangy.com · justia.com · pisb.nd.gov · expertinstitute.com · mayerbrown.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

OhioRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Ohio rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Ohio-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Ohio Department of Public Safety, Ohio Homeland Security, Private Investigator Security Guard Services (PISGS)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	In the most expedient time possible, but not later than 45 days after discovery or notification of the breach. Regulator: No Attorney General notice required; nationwide consumer reporting agencies must be notified if more than 1,000 Ohio residents are affected. Ohio Rev. Code § 1349.19
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Ohio Rev. Code § 2933.52
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. Ohio Evid. R. 702; Miller v. Bike Athletic Co., 80 Ohio St.3d 607 (1998)
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of Ohio.

Sources: codes.ohio.gov · justia.com · homelandsecurity.ohio.gov · expertinstitute.com · mayerbrown.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

OklahomaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Oklahoma rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Oklahoma-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Council on Law Enforcement Education and Training (CLEET)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Without unreasonable delay. Regulator: Oklahoma Attorney General within 60 days after notifying residents if 500+ residents are affected; credit bureaus too if 1,000+. 24 Okla. Stat. §§ 161-166 (Security Breach Notification Act, as amended by SB 626 effective Jan. 1, 2026)
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Okla. Stat. tit. 13, § 176.4
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. 12 Okla. Stat. § 2702; Taylor v. State (Okla. Crim. App. 1995); Christian v. Gray, 2003 OK 10
Consumer privacy law	Oklahoma Consumer Data Privacy Act (SB 546), effective January 1, 2027.
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Eastern and Western Districts of Oklahoma.

Sources: globalpolicywatch.com · justia.com · oklahoma.gov · hunton.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

OregonRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Oregon rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Oregon-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Oregon Department of Public Safety Standards and Training (DPSST)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	In the most expeditious manner possible, without unreasonable delay, but not later than 45 days after discovery. Regulator: Oregon Attorney General if more than 250 Oregon residents are notified. Or. Rev. Stat. §§ 646A.600-646A.628 (notice at § 646A.604)
Recording calls	Mixed: the rule depends on the situation (for example in person versus by phone). Or. Rev. Stat. § 165.540
Expert evidence	A reliability test modeled on Daubert. OEC 702 (ORS 40.410); State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 (1984); State v. O'Key, 321 Or 285 (1995)
Consumer privacy law	Oregon Consumer Privacy Act, effective July 1, 2024.
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon.

Sources: constangy.com · justia.com · oregonlegislature.gov · wmcbdlaw.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

PennsylvaniaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Pennsylvania rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Pennsylvania-licensed partner agencies (no statewide investigator license; we confirm local requirements).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Without unreasonable delay. Regulator: Pennsylvania Attorney General, at the same time as resident notice, if more than 500 Pennsylvania residents must be notified. 73 P.S. § 2301 et seq. (Breach of Personal Information Notification Act)
Recording calls	All-party consent: everyone in a private conversation generally must agree before it is recorded. 18 Pa.C.S. §§ 5703, 5704
Expert evidence	Frye general-acceptance standard. Pa.R.E. 702; Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc., 839 A.2d 1038 (Pa. 2003)
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Eastern, Middle and Western Districts of Pennsylvania.

Sources: constangy.com · justia.com · lancastercountypa.gov · pietragallo.com · mayerbrown.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

Rhode IslandRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Rhode Island rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Rhode Island-licensed partner agencies (no statewide investigator license; we confirm local requirements).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	In the most expedient time possible, but no later than 45 calendar days after confirmation of the breach. Regulator: Rhode Island Attorney General if more than 500 Rhode Island residents are notified. R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 11-49.3-1 to 11-49.3-6 (Identity Theft Protection Act)
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-35-21
Expert evidence	A reliability test modeled on Daubert. R.I. R. Evid. 702; DiPetrillo v. Dow Chemical Co., 729 A.2d 677 (R.I. 1999)
Consumer privacy law	Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act, effective January 1, 2026.
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island.

Sources: constangy.com · justia.com · webserver.rilegislature.gov · expertinstitute.com · mayerbrown.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

South CarolinaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. South Carolina treats some forensic examination as licensed investigative work (South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED), Regulatory Services), so we do not send examiners into South Carolina; if your matter needs a device collected on site there, we coordinate a South Carolina-licensed examiner for that step.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted South Carolina-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED), Regulatory Services).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	In the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, consistent with the legitimate needs of law enforcement. Regulator: If more than 1,000 persons are notified at one time: notify the Consumer Protection Division of the SC Department of Consumer Affairs and all nationwide consumer reporting agencies without unreasonable delay. S.C. Code Ann. § 39-1-90
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. S.C. Code Ann. § 17-30-20
Expert evidence	The state’s own reliability test. S.C. R. Evid. 702; State v. Council, 515 S.E.2d 508 (S.C. 1999); Graves v. CAS Medical Systems, 735 S.E.2d 650 (S.C. 2012)
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina.

Sources: scstatehouse.gov · justia.com · sled.sc.gov · mwl-law.com · lewisrice.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

South DakotaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm South Dakota rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted South Dakota-licensed partner agencies (no statewide investigator license; we confirm local requirements).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	No later than 60 days after discovery or notification of the breach. Regulator: Attorney General if the breach exceeds 250 South Dakota residents; all nationwide consumer reporting agencies whenever any resident is notified. SDCL §§ 22-40-19 to 22-40-26
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. SDCL § 23A-35A-20
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. SDCL § 19-19-702; State v. Hofer, 512 N.W.2d 482 (S.D. 1994)
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota.

Sources: consumer.sd.gov · justia.com · harborcompliance.com · mwl-law.com · lewisrice.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

TennesseeRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Tennessee rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Tennessee-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Tennessee Department of Commerce & Insurance, Private Investigation and Polygraph Commission).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	No later than 45 days after discovery or notification of the breach. Regulator: No state AG/regulator notice required; if more than 1,000 residents are notified, notify all nationwide consumer reporting agencies without unreasonable delay. Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-2107
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-601
Expert evidence	A reliability test modeled on Daubert. Tenn. R. Evid. 702, 703; McDaniel v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 955 S.W.2d 257 (Tenn. 1997)
Consumer privacy law	Tennessee Information Protection Act, effective July 1, 2025.
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Eastern, Middle and Western Districts of Tennessee.

Sources: dwt.com · justia.com · tn.gov · expertinstitute.com · lewisrice.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

TexasRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. Texas treats some forensic examination as licensed investigative work (Texas Department of Public Safety, Private Security Program), so we do not send examiners into Texas; if your matter needs a device collected on site there, we coordinate a Texas-licensed examiner for that step.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Texas-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Texas Department of Public Safety, Private Security Program).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	As quickly as possible, and no later than 60 days after determining a breach occurred. Regulator: Texas Attorney General no later than 30 days after determining the breach occurred if it involves at least 250 Texas residents; nationwide CRAs if more than 10,000 persons notified. Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 521.053
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Tex. Penal Code § 16.02
Expert evidence	A reliability test modeled on Daubert. Tex. R. Evid. 702; E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Robinson, 923 S.W.2d 549 (Tex. 1995)
Consumer privacy law	Texas Data Privacy and Security Act, effective July 1, 2024.
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Southern, Eastern and Western Districts of Texas.

Sources: dwt.com · justia.com · dps.texas.gov · mwl-law.com · lewisrice.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

UtahRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Utah rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Utah-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Utah Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Identification (with Private Investigator Hearing and Licensure Board)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	In the most expedient time possible without unreasonable delay, consistent with determining scope and restoring system integrity. Regulator: Office of the Attorney General and Utah Cyber Center if 500 or more Utah residents affected; nationwide CRAs if more than 1,000 residents notified. Utah Code Ann. §§ 13-44-101 to 13-44-301 (notice at § 13-44-202)
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Utah Code Ann. § 77-23a-4
Expert evidence	A reliability test modeled on Daubert. Utah R. Evid. 702 (amended 2007); State v. Rimmasch, 775 P.2d 388 (Utah 1989)
Consumer privacy law	Utah Consumer Privacy Act, effective December 31, 2023.
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Utah.

Sources: workplaceprivacyreport.com · justia.com · piau.com · legacy.utcourts.gov · lewisrice.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

VermontRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Vermont rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Vermont-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Vermont Secretary of State, Office of Professional Regulation (Private Investigative and Security Services)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, but not later than 45 days after discovery. Regulator: Preliminary notice to the Attorney General within 14 business days of discovery (any size), plus follow-up when consumers are notified; nationwide CRAs if more than 1,000 residents notified. 9 V.S.A. §§ 2430, 2435
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. No Vermont statute; federal 18 U.S.C. § 2511 applies
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. V.R.E. 702; State v. Brooks, 162 Vt. 26, 643 A.2d 226 (1993)
Consumer privacy law	Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (Act 145 of 2026, S.71), effective January 1, 2028.
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont.

Sources: dwt.com · rcfp.org · legislature.vermont.gov · mwl-law.com · legislature.vermont.gov. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

VirginiaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. Sources indicate Virginia does not require an investigator license for digital examiners.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Virginia-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS), Private Security Services).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Without unreasonable delay following discovery or notification of the breach (reasonable delay allowed to determine scope and restore integrity). Regulator: Office of the Attorney General must be notified of any breach affecting residents; if more than 1,000 residents notified at one time, also notify AG and nationwide CRAs of timing, distribution and content. Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-186.6
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-62
Expert evidence	The state’s own reliability test. Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-401.1; Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va. 78 (1990)
Consumer privacy law	Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act, effective January 1, 2023.
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Virginia.

Sources: law.lis.virginia.gov · justia.com · law.lis.virginia.gov · jackscamp.com · lewisrice.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

WashingtonRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Washington rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Washington-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Washington State Department of Licensing).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Most expedient time possible, without unreasonable delay, and no more than 30 calendar days after the breach was discovered. Regulator: Attorney General within 30 days of discovery if more than 500 Washington residents affected; no CRA notice required. Rev. Code Wash. § 19.255.010
Recording calls	All-party consent: everyone in a private conversation generally must agree before it is recorded. Rev. Code Wash. § 9.73.030
Expert evidence	Frye general-acceptance standard. Wash. ER 702; State v. Riker, 869 P.2d 43 (Wash. 1994); Anderson v. Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc., 172 Wn.2d 593 (2011)
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Washington.

Sources: app.leg.wa.gov · justia.com · app.leg.wa.gov · law.justia.com · lewisrice.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

West VirginiaRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm West Virginia rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted West Virginia-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by West Virginia Secretary of State).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Without unreasonable delay, consistent with measures to determine scope and restore reasonable system integrity. Regulator: No AG/regulator notice required; if more than 1,000 residents notified, notify all nationwide consumer reporting agencies without unreasonable delay. W. Va. Code §§ 46A-2A-101 to 46A-2A-105
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. W. Va. Code § 62-1D-3
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. W. Va. R. Evid. 702; Wilt v. Buracker, 443 S.E.2d 196 (W. Va.)
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia.

Sources: dwt.com · justia.com · code.wvlegislature.gov · mwl-law.com · lewisrice.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

WisconsinRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Wisconsin rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Wisconsin-licensed partner agencies (investigators are licensed by Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services (DSPS)).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Within a reasonable time, not to exceed 45 days after learning of the breach. Regulator: No AG/regulator notice required under general statute; if more than 1,000 individuals notified, notify all nationwide consumer reporting agencies without unreasonable delay. Wis. Stat. § 134.98
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Wis. Stat. § 968.31(2)(c)
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. Wis. Stat. § 907.02(1) (Daubert adopted by 2011 amendment); State v. Giese, 2014 WI App 92
Federal courts	U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Wisconsin.

Sources: dwt.com · justia.com · dsps.wi.gov · law.marquette.edu · lewisrice.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

WyomingRemote or mail-in forensics · cyber & IT · field work via licensed partners

Forensics, cyber & IT	Mail-in to our Arizona lab or remote collection, examined in Arizona under our Arizona license; cyber and IT remote. We confirm Wyoming rules for your matter before work starts.
OSINT, background, financial & asset work	Remote from Arizona.
On-the-ground work	Field investigators, surveillance, process service, security officers and patrol: through vetted Wyoming-licensed partner agencies (no statewide investigator license; we confirm local requirements).
Executive protection	Through licensed partner agencies, coordinated by our Arizona team.
Data-breach notice	Most expedient time possible without unreasonable delay, after determining misuse has occurred or is reasonably likely, consistent with determining breach scope. Regulator: No AG/regulator or consumer reporting agency notice required. Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 40-12-501 to 40-12-502
Recording calls	One-party consent: a participant may generally record their own conversation. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-3-702
Expert evidence	Daubert reliability standard. W.R.E. 702; Bunting v. Jamieson, 984 P.2d 467 (Wyo. 1999)
Federal courts	U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming.

Sources: dwt.com · justia.com · wyomingdci.wyo.gov · mwl-law.com · lewisrice.com. Summaries as of October 2026; not legal advice.

Outside the United States

Clients abroad use the same remote services: forensic collection and analysis, incident response, OSINT and due diligence, delivered from Arizona within U.S. law and the law where the client is. On-the-ground needs outside the U.S. are scoped case by case.

Coverage questions

Do you have offices outside Arizona?

No. Our team and lab are in Arizona. Remote services reach every state from here, and on-the-ground work outside Arizona is done through vetted partner agencies licensed where the work happens.

How does digital forensics work if I am in another state?

We send a mail-in kit or collect the data remotely over a guided session, or a local partner collects the device. Everything is logged under chain of custody, examined in our Arizona lab and reported in a court-ready format.

Will the findings hold up in my state's courts?

We document methods so they can be tested under your state's expert-evidence standard (Daubert, Frye or a state test, shown for each state above) and support declarations and testimony.

Can you send an investigator, process server or security officer to my town?

In Arizona, yes, with our own licensed team. Elsewhere we coordinate a vetted agency licensed in that state and stay your single point of contact.

I am an attorney outside Arizona. Can you work my case?

Yes. Your client ships the device to our Arizona lab in a mail-in kit, or we collect the data remotely, and the examination is done in Arizona under our Arizona license. We do not send examiners out of state; if on-site collection is unavoidable, we coordinate a licensed local examiner for that step. Cyber security and IT work is remote in every state.

How do I know if you cover my town?

Use the coverage check above with your ZIP code or town and state, or request coverage and we will confirm what we can run for your matter.

Request coverage

Honeybadger Solutions LLC is a veteran-owned firm headquartered in Casa Grande, Arizona, holding Arizona DPS Private Investigations Agency License #1759795 and Security Guard Agency License #1759798, and a verified Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (CAGE 9FNE2). Coverage reflects how we deliver each service in a given area, not a claim of licensure everywhere; we confirm exact coverage for your matter. Book a confidential consultation.

Coverage & Service Areas

Is my town covered?